Thursday, December 8, 2016

Congressman Ted Lieu's Double standars; Taiwan President and Donald Trump





Donald Trump won the Presidential elections and received congratulatory phone calls from leaders around the world; from Russia, Europe and Taiwan. (A self claimed liberal) Congressman Ted Lieu wrote several tweets and posts strongly criticizing Donald Trump the President elect of the United States merely for receiving a phone call. Ted Lieu tweeted that that the phone call was deliberate and calculated. 


Interestingly, the criticizing congressman was seen contacting, greeting and receiving multiple Taiwanese Presidents within the past few months. Was that deliberate and calculated? 
On March 17 2016, Congressman Ted Lieu received Taiwanese President Ma at Los Angeles. In June, Mr. Lieu traveled to Taiwan to Congratulate the newly elected President of Taiwan Tsai Ing-wen. At the end of June Ted Lieu greeted newly elected President in Los Angeles. 


Ted Lieu's selfie with the Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen 

. .

Ted Lieu's Receiving Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen at Los Angeles





Congressman Ted Lieu Dining with Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen in Los Angeles


Ted Lieu's Traveled to Taiwan to Greet Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen 



Receiving & Greeting Previous Taiwanese President Ma To at Los Angeles 




Ted Lieu's message to foreign policy experts 

Ted Lieu's "Note to all arrogant foreign policy experts" 


 Mr. Lieu seems to believe that his greeting and receiving Taiwanese President(s) is consistent with American foreign policy while criticizes President Trump merely for receiving a phone call.
================
PhysicianForFairness.blgospot.com
PhysiciansForFairness.org 
 www.PhysicianForFairness.com
facebook.com/PhysiciansForFairness
twitter.com/rehan_sheikh 

News
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-taiwan-phone-call-was-weeks-in-the-planning-say-people-who-were-involved/2016/12/04/f8be4b0c-ba4e-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html







Posted by at No comments:

Monday, September 5, 2016

California Eliminated Doctor's Right to Cross Examine adverse Witness


Right to cross examine adverse witness goes to the heart of the judicial process in order to ensure credibility and truthfulness. Right to Cross Examine adverse witness is available in all civilized societies except in California. California is deceitly denying such fundamental Right to victim Doctors NOT via a Royal decree but via order of a judge. 

 How 'the process' goes
California Attorney General publishes accusations against victim Doctor (in the name of the Medical Board) that must to be proved before the member of the Medical Board. In order to justify revocation of a victim Doctor's Right to Work (aka License), the attorney general would benefit from services of an adverse witness. 

 The office of Attorney General engages in a secret communication with a "Doctor for Sale" who is paid for giving adverse opinion. The Attorney General may share incomplete or purjured Medical records/ documents and ask the "Doctor for Sale" to give adverse 'opinion' (or report) against the victim doctor. No one can say for sure who may write the opinion of the "Doctor for Sale". A "Doctor for Sale" or an examining doctor may have lesser experience or training than the victim doctor. 

 A victim Doctor can defend himself/ herself by cross examining the "Doctor for Sale" or an examining doctor. But Attorney General's real Goal is to deprive a Victim Doctor's Right to Work (License) by hook or crook; so a Judge conveniently issued an order denying 'victim Doctor's  Right to Cross Examine adverse witness. 

 Doctors are not the only victims but it is now general public at large who has become victim on deprivation of fundamental Rights such as Driving License. California is denying numerous Rights associated with the Judicial process such as Right to discovery and Right to a fair hearing. No rules, No Rights. 

Hon. Goofy for Healthcare


https://twitter.com/GoofyBarksFor

https://www.facebook.com/GoofyForHealthcare

Hon. Goofy For Healthcare is the First Dog Representing Doctors and Patients.

 ================
Selective Regulations of Healthcare Professionals

https://www.facebook.com/PhysiciansForFairness




More Reading
California Attorney General, Physicians License, and Medical Board 
http://wp.me/p4cMhN-28 


California Attorney General, Driving License, and Department of Motor Vehicles- (DMV) 
https://physiciansforfairness.org/2015/05/31/californias-lack-of-due-process-for-driving-license-suspension-challenged-in-the-ninth-circuit-court-of-appeals/

California denying Right to Cross Examine Adverse Witness  
https://www.scribd.com/document/323099322/California-Judges-Denying-Doctor-s-Right-to-Cross-Examine-Complete 

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Medical Board Member 'Blocked' Goofy for Healthcare on Social Media



California Medical Board Member Kristina Lawson Blocked Goofy for Healthcare on Twitter in order to avoid a meaningful dialogue. Only an oxygen deprived member of California Medical Board would 'block' such a cute dog. Goofy for Healthcare, who is the First Dog representing Doctors and Patients, is heartbroken. 





The 'Block' came immediately after the legislative day separately organized by California Medical Board and Physicians For Fairness. Kristina Lawson along with other members of the Medical Board, went to meet Assembly members and Senators and Hon. Goofy noticed suspicious activity. Later attorney Kristina Lawson also attempted to delete some of her tweets and comments on her facebook page. 


Fraud behind label - 'Consumer Protection ' 
California has devised a mechanism to selectively deprive good physicians of their Right to work to cover up dishonesty and Civil Rights violations by hospitals and corporations. The scheme continues as California Attorney general not only takes Doctor's licenses without any trial but also ensures that doctors never have any opportunity for a Fair Trial even after suspension of license. To make such political scheme palatable, the Medical Board is deceptively labelled as 'Consumer Protection agency'. 
Gov. Jerry Brown saved California but Kristina was not sure and deleted her tweets on How Jerry Brown saved California.... 


Not long ago, Gov. Jerry Brown appointed Kristina Lawson on the Medical Board.  
The President of the Medical Board, David Serrano Sewell, is an attorney working for city and county of San Francisco. Mr. President, a Government attorney, welcoming another Government attorney Kristina to 'Regulate Practice of Medicine'. Kristina's primary job on the Medical Board is passively aggressive; to maintain silence while attorney general continues to implement anti doctor & anti patient schemes of injustice to promote corporate greed; of course in the name of the Medical Board.

 
About Kristina
Kristina Lawson was a city council member/ mayor of city of walnut creek before appointment on the Medical Board. Previously Governor Brown had appointed Assembly Member Susan Bonilla as chair of Assembly Business and Professions committee where Ms Bonilla had oversight over the Medical Board. Attorney Kristina Denial Lawson works at Manatt, Phelps & Philipps, LLP at their San Francisco office. In the recent appointments, Gov. Brown has demonstrated emphasis towards appointing 'Government attorneys' and Government employees for obvious reasons. 

Gov. Jerry Brown busy with Medical Board appointments
In 2011 several Members of the Medical Board tendered their resignation to Gov Brown. In a meeting after the Resignations, Secretary Anna Caballero announced that Gov. Brown will quickly appoint more members on the Medical Board. In the rush the Gov. appointed, his real estate buddy from Oakland, a High school dropout on the Medical Board who was quietly removed after Physicians for Fairness took notice. 


Hon. Goofy for Healthcare


https://twitter.com/GoofyBarksFor

https://www.facebook.com/GoofyForHealthcare

 Hon. Goofy For Healthcare is the First Dog Representing Doctors and Patients.
================
Selective Regulations of Healthcare Professionals

https://www.facebook.com/PhysiciansForFairness
http://Physicianforfairness.com/
http://Physiciansforfairness.org/


More Reading
Civil Rights Award amid Civil Rights Violations 
http://wp.me/p4cMhN-28 

Human Rights attorney urges the President to take action on the Medical Board
http://physicianforfairness.blogspot.com/2014/08/human-rights-forum-urges-president-to.html 

Last speech - Dr. Gary Gitnick - Prof UCLA, President Med Board (July 10, 2010)
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ym8dv_the-last-sermon-from-president-of-california-medical-board_news

First Medical Board meeting after Resignations and events (videos) 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svW08XVDsdc&list=PLdrikQ1IoFF_FSQSTVxSTaBW0KDHWXo6t 

San Joaquin County filed another court case to again take possession of doctor's Mobile Home 
http://physicianforfairness.blogspot.com/2014/08/county-hospital-wants-to-take-second.html 



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,
Location: Capitol Ave, Sacramento, CA, USA

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Now the Court Clerk comes to rescue Attoreny General Kamala Harris







The Ninth Circuit Court Clerk, arbitrarily and capriciously, order’s himself to strikes plaintiff’s Legal Brief since Attorney General Kamala Harri’s Legal team ‘ran out’ of legal arguments. 

Legal Brief
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) arbitrarily suspended plaintiff's Driving License; Then denied a Notice of Accusations and a hearing before a Judge. Plaintiff filed a supplementary Brief before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The legal arguments in the brief are so persuasive that plaintiff will prevail as soon as it is heard by the Judge. Since Kamala legal team cannot present any arguments in opposition so she finds another proxy this time, the Clerk of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Effectively, the court Clerk issued summary judgment for Kamala Harris without any hearing by any judge.


An image of Clerk's Order



Fundamental Requirements Due Process Clause(s)  
One of the primary questions in the opening brief is whether there is a Right to hearing before a Judge on suspension of Driving License. In her ‘Legal Arguments’ Kamala Harris previously denied Right to hearing before a Judge. So the second question came in the Supplementary Brief whether people even have a Right to get a simple Notice of accusations on suspension of Driving License?

Troubling Questions

The Legal Brief is properly submitted before United States Judge(s) and only Judge(s) are authorized to rule on the legal brief not a clerk. A clerk’s arbitrary and capricious order to himself striking Legal Brief raises further troubling questions.  

1) Did the Ninth Circuit Court clerk simply denied Article III Constitutional Right to be heard by a United States Judge?   
2) Who authorized the Clerk to strike legal brief without any cause?
 
What's in it for everyone 
If the DMV suspends your Driving License without any Notice and without any hearing, How can you restore Driving Licenses? In the absence of Driving License, How can you go to work or school or church? 
Dear Clerk, do you even care?


================

Links to key Articles and Legal Documents
Link - Summary of Supplementary Brief  


Link - Supplementary Brief (Plaintiff' Supplementary Brief - Docket #21) 

Link (Summary of Case)- Appeal filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Link - Motion to Strike unsigned order of Driving License suspension unlawful

Civil Rights Organizations, Attorneys, interested parties,
Please contact for inquiries or for participation.
Posted by at 2 comments:

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

The DMV secretly files accusations on Driving License records without any Notice...



In this case, the DMV secretly filed accusations on Driving License records, without any Notice of accusations to the licensee. Such accusations on the driving license report benefit auto insurance companies as they can charge more for auto insurance. 
California's licensing agencies are taking away people Rights even without the bare minimum requirements of the Due Process. No notice of accusations, no need for hearing.

What is Due Process

The United States Judges have repeatedly offered guidelines on the definition of the Due Process. The bare minimum requirement of the Due Process are a Notice and opportunity for hearing as noted the Supreme Court. For example
Many controversies have raged about the cryptic and abstract words of the Due Process Clause but there can be no doubt that at a minimum they require that deprivation of life, liberty or property by adjudication be preceded by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case. Mullane, Special Guardian, v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., Trustee, et al. 339 U.S. 306 (1950)
The purpose of the Due Process is to promote Access to Justice and to prevent undue injury to American people especially by the State agencies. Although the Due Process does not guarantee Justice it does offer a possibility of Justice. 

In wild west culture, the rogue cartels, held meeting in a room next to a bar, without any Notice to the other party, and issued orders to take away people's Right. People could not contest the accusations because they did not even know about the secret accusations. 

 Legal Question before Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals


The DMV filed an additional accusation of “Lack of Knowledge or skill” on
plaintiff’s driving license records without his knowledge. The DMV made those
records available to public and to auto insurance corporations without any
Notice to plaintiff.
Does the DMV has a mandatory duty, in order to satisfy the Due Process
Clause(s), to issue a written Notice to plaintiff?



Link - Supplementary Brief 
(Ninth Circuit Case Number: 14-16858, Plaintiff' Supplementary Brief - Docket #21- Rehan Sheikh v Brian Kelly) 

Previous articles on this case - Driving License Suspension 
Link - Motion to Strike unsigned order of Driving License suspension unlawful
Link - Appeal filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Civil Rights Organizations, Attorneys, interested parties,
Please contact for inquiries or participation.
================
Protection of Public or violation of Rights ...?
www.PhysicianForFairness.com
facebook.com/PhysiciansForFairness
twitter.com/rehan_sheikh

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)